Why Not Apply For Funding?

Jack Lowe at The Lizard RNLI lifeboat station (photograph by John Chennells)

I first posted the following words yesterday as a Twitter thread. The topic seemed to resonate with many, so I’m posting it here too as a more permanent resource:

‘Why not apply for funding?’ regularly comes up in conversations about financing my project. But is it really such a crackpot idea to keep working towards my vision of sustainable funding for creators: for projects to be funded by the people who follow them and whose lives are enriched by them in some way?

I believe that notion is entirely within reach for many creators without having to resort to pots of institutionalised funding, which can limit thinking and become serial flashes in the pan rather than a much more valuable source of income — one that is sustained and more predictable.

There are other benefits too: no corporate logos attached to your project; no pound of flesh to the body funding it and perhaps claiming more credit than is due; not having to adapt your ideas to suit institutional agendas; not having to adapt your language in the application to be ‘awarded’ the money (a particular bugbear) and not having to pay somebody to fill out an application form (an even bigger bugbear).

In short, my vision enables a creator to make their work freely on their own terms. As I mentioned at the top, I truly believe this is entirely possible. We can all be inspired by the fact that other creators are doing it right now. Brandon Stanton and Amanda Palmer spring to mind — two longstanding influences of mine on the indie-funding front.

And I’m getting there myself. It might help to spur you on to know that there are now few days of the month when I don’t receive *some* income from my independent membership platform, The LSP Society.

Some days it might be £1 and other days it might be £100 (many signed up on/after launch day). It feels like manna from heaven to know, that no matter how difficult things are, there will always be something coming in at some point soon.

It’s great for a creator’s psyche and I’m concerned that the path of institutional funding can actually be damaging for a creator’s psyche.

There will be people conflicted by this conversation and I also know that pots of funding do suit certain projects but I keep plugging away at this ethos. After all, if people were interested in a topic ‘back in the day’, they wouldn’t have hesitated to buy a magazine from the newsagent. In fact they would have looked forward to it! So why not now?

Well, I believe that people can and will support projects now. They just need to be shown how and many will be delighted to do so at the drop of a hat.

One final thought: if choosing this path, creators must commit wholeheartedly with passion, belief and conviction. I’ve seen people gamble weeks (and small fortunes) filling out an application form without knowing what the outcome will be.

So why not consider redirecting more of those energies on a mechanism that can sustain you every day for years to come and on your terms? It’s much less risky and the results are often immediate.

Food for thought I hope, as well as food on the table.

Keep on keepin’ on,

Jack Lowe

Creator of The Lifeboat Station Project

A New Device, A New Language, A New Frontier

That’s the claim from photographer Adam Magyar. He’s right, yet still he’s modest.

When this lecture was waved over my screen, it was accompanied by much of the usual cyberbole.

However, my source was sound and of good repute, so I’m glad I gave up 20 minutes of my life to it. I think you will be too…

Phonebloks: A Phone Worth Keeping?

Before I go any further, take a look at this pitch for Phonebloks — it’s just shy of 3 minutes long and will be worth it:

What do you think?

As somebody who likes to keep the tools of my trade working for as long as possible, I’m pretty excited by the concept; a seemingly sensible proposal and a slight antidote to the Upgrade Generation.

A “slight” antidote because it’s by no means the whole answer but a step in the right direction, don’t you think?

At the very least, the throwaway mentality might be slowed…

“Phoneblok is made of detachable bloks. The bloks are connected to the base which locks everything together into a solid phone. If a blok breaks you can easily replace it; if it’s getting old just upgrade.”

And it is only a concept at this stage — Dave Hakkens simply seems to be ‘putting it out there’ in an effort to spark enough interest from enough of the right people to maybe, just maybe, get this thing off the ground.

Phonebloks, a phone worth keeping

I must admit to being quite surprised by his note on copyright, though:

“If you want to set up this platform please do, the sooner the better. We would appreciate it if you would keep us updated though, we might have some ideas for it!”

It seems strange, after all his efforts, that Mr. Hakkens doesn’t have any rights over the idea and is willing to just ‘let it go’. Or maybe I’m missing something?

Of course, people will likely get hooked on the modular bits-and-bobs but I like the main ethos — that this is a phone worth keeping and that you only replace the modules that need replacing if they become faulty or outdated.

Oh, and it’s like Lego for grown-ups, which is good (!).

How can you show your support?

I’ve joined the Thunderclap for 29th October.

If you think this is a great idea, join the Thunderclap too, which will help really spread the word — I hope it can work in some way shape or form.

I’d be interested to hear your thoughts…

The World in 2012 According to Jon Levy


Sheesh! I’ve nearly managed to finish a blog post on the sea.

However, the bread and butter of life, along with the plethora of great material that crops up on the web, has delayed things a little.

In the meantime, I feel compelled to share Jon Levy’s thoughts on photography.  It’s not often that I reblog, in fact this might even be the first time.

Jon Levy is the founder of Foto8.  His opinions aren’t everybody’s cup of tea but he does put across clear, strong, honest views that are worth listening to.

To my mind — and as one commenter wrote — photographers of all types, including (perhaps especially) students of photography should watch this video, read the nineteen top tips, print them out, frame them and re-read them every day.

The video might seem long but it’s invaluable — I made the time to listen to it in full this evening while I tidied the kitchen…

Anyway, please feel free to leave a comment or two and share your thoughts…

“You just need a notepad, a camera and an inquisitive mind… listen on and hopefully you will be equally reassured of a few things that will empower you and blow the boring, self indulged, narcissistic fauxtojournalist documentary squatters off the face of this earth for good.” — Jon Levy

Here is my 2012 list of 10 19 things they didn’t want you to know about photography but are actually true*.

[everything needs editing, that includes me]

1. There is such thing as truth and yes you can pursue, find it, photograph it and report it.

2. Photojournalism is not dead, it has just been so utterly and completely bored stiff by the crap that “documentary artists” have been spouting that its been hibernating, waiting for them and their photo-fair ilk to go back to Monaco.

3. You cannot learn photography at university, you cannot use a degree to report, record or tell someone’s story. The photographers who need an MA are the ones who want to teach other photographers to get THEIR MAs . That’s not photography.

4. You can learn photography for FREE every single day of your life by taking pictures and looking at lots of them around you. If you insist on going to university make sure you have a brilliant time, make lots of friends and pay no attention to what the lecturer says about this exciting advent of new media, they are too old to understand it anyway.

5. There is no such thing as New Media, Multi Media or Transmedia. There is only photography and words. If you choose to make your photos move like a movie or your words audible like audio then great, just don’t tell people you’ve invented a new genre or hybrid hoping they will think your project is interesting.

6. If a publisher doesn’t want to publish your book then perhaps don’t publish it. If they want to charge you for the pleasure then make sure your granny has an inheritance for you first. (Its not worth it.) Self publishing is the photo book equivalent to those guys who are building the first citizen space rocket to the moon. You will have lots of lovely days costing lots of money but getting to the moon is not going to happen.

7. By all means do make a book dummy. If your photographs are ever going to be in a book then its great to know what kind of book you may want and test who you think it’s for. But remember books are not why you take photographs in the first or last place. If that is not the case for you then I suggest you write a novel instead. Yes, that’s bloody hard isn’t it? What made you think slapping some pictures on a page and calling it a book made it good?

8. Never tell anyone that your photographs should speak for themselves. They don’t! It’s a piece of paper with ink on it! It doesn’t speak. Photographs are how you can see emotions or render action or show what things are really like. Pictures without words are like a car with no steering wheel (and no, I don’t mean 3000 word soliloquies on the meaning of life and the language of photography or miniscule thumbnails at the back of the book hidden in shame at the back).

9. There are enough stories in the world already, for this generation at least, about transvestites and for that matter one legged footballers from Sierra Leone. There are not however enough stories about that person sleeping outside in -10degress or walking 20 miles to a foodbank in your town.

10. If you can put “around the world” after your story title (like transvestites around the world, poverty around the world, great images from around the world) then your story is a failure. The only people who have been “around the world” are astronauts and you are not one of them. Besides if your story is no good in England to the people here it won’t be better if you add 10 more places where the same thing happens and hope I end up liking at least one of them.

11. Magazines and newspapers do send people on assignment. There are lots of grumpy photographers, mostly hanging around art galleries groaning about how things have changed, who also feel they should be getting paid to gallivant from story to story. If they aren’t getting paid it’s because someone else is either better or more suited. Maybe they should make a self published book or take up university teaching instead?

12. No one makes a living selling prints in galleries. We all know that “1 in 20” or 1 in anything of a photo edition is a complete fabrication. The collectors know it too but their wallets are oversized and shopping for photographs suits them. If a 17th century painting of London by a good artists fetches £600 at auction you must be either joking or cheating if you price your digitally reproduced photograph at £2000 just because you scrawled your name on the back.

13. All photographers will gladly make an extra print for their friends or for the collector who comes along with the biggest wallet. Even after “the edition” has “sold out”.

14. If you shoot pictures exclusively for galleries and have decided you are “so over” working for magazines or newspapers then good luck. But do not ever expect to put documentary or photojournalism on your work as a validation of why its made if you are that selective about who is able to view it.

15. If you mention the phrase “compassion fatigue” you have already cast a spell on yourself stronger than the one that kept Sleeping Beauty snoring for 100 years. If this is your mantra for how you feel about things then I suggest you either change your name to Hilton or Kardashian or just come out of the closet and declare that suffering is an artistic philosophical concept and caring is something you only do whilst sipping your Cosmopolitan and wondering whether the global economic crash will make cashmere more or less expensive.

16. Photographers are not terrorists. Nor are writers and nor are radio or tv reporters. If they are working for Al Jazeera or Al Aqsa or the BBC or ABC the chances are they at least don’t instagram images of themselves in war zones because they think its cool. Leave that to the guy from CNN but none the less do not suspect you are better than them or visa versa. If a drama TV series like Homeland decides that a TV van is a good story cover for a bomb ignore them but do not ever let them make you that you should not be there doing your job of reporting.

17. You cannot tell stories if you are generally a content and laid back individual who is happy at the status quo. George Osborne is not a good chancellor and Barak Obama can aways do better. If you don’t believe these things then I suggest you go into accounting instead.

18. EARNING A LIVING is not a god-given right in photography. You are not owed a living wage for taking pictures. It’s a hard graft and not everyone makes it. You are however entitled in this day and age to get a job doing something else and STILL take pictures about what matters to you. You can still publish and tell your stories, maybe even more effectively.

19. People, mainly me, spend far too much time worrying about what institutions like Magnum or The Photographers’ gallery are or aren’t doing, if they are doing it well or properly or whether Paris Photo is good this year or bad and how as photographers they can manoeuvre their careers towards these clubs where the gatekeepers of good photography supposedly reside. The truth is there is a universe of diversity and talent out there, a myriad of different organisations and individuals making amazing work, reaching audiences in unbelievably effective ways, so go do it too and make your own rules.

*Thanks for a brilliant 2012 and may all your photographic dreams come true in 2013.

Colourful Mysteries of the Mind

The mind moves in mysterious ways, not least when it comes to colour and tone.

As a photographer and printmaker, I’m always mindful of the environment in which I assess  imagery to ensure I’m making correct judgements.

If you haven’t considered how radically different colours can look when placed in different scenarios, it maybe worth you delving a little deeper into this interesting journey…

One of my favourite sites on the subject is Purves Lab — take a look at the see for yourself section and prepare to be amazed at the twists and turns of human colour perception!

Standard Colour Test from Purves Lab

The two circles appear to be different colours — are they really…?